Call Us: 1.800.873.5297


TVM Update: $5.7 Million Jury Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson in California Transvaginal Mesh Case

According to Reuters, yet another jury has returned a multi-million dollar award against Johnson & Johnson in a vaginal mesh lawsuit. In the latest of a series of trials, a California state jury sitting in Kern County awarded a $5.7 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiary Ethicon for complications with Ethicon’s Gynecare TVT Abbrevo device. The jury ordered Ethicon to pay $700,000 in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages, after they found the company acted with gross negligence. The $5 million in punitive damages is designed to punish Ethicon for conducting its business with malice towards women, after the jury determined that the company knew the TVT Abbrevo vaginal mesh caused severe complications but failed to warn doctors and patients.

More than 70,000 similar lawsuits are pending in federal courts against Ethicon and manufacturers of other similar products, including Boston Scientific, C.R. Bard, American Medical Systems, Coloplast, and Cook Medical. United States District Judge Joseph Goodwin is overseeing seven different multidistrict litigations (MDLs) against different manufacturers in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. The cases all involve similar allegations that the mesh products are defectively designed and can cause severe injuries, including infection, mesh erosion, mesh contraction, puncturing of vital organs, chronic pelvic and neuropathic pain, recurrence of prolapse and/or incontinence, pain during sexual intercourse, and additional surgeries to remove and/or replace the device.

If you or a loved one has experienced serious injuries as a result of a transvaginal mesh device, please contacone of our experienced attorneys at Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, LLP toll-free at 1-800-873-5297. We will confidentially evaluate your case for free and without any obligation. Visit their pharmaceutical and medical device page for more information about transvaginal mesh lawsuits.


The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements. The cases discussed do not predict outcomes in future cases. Past results afford no guarantee of future results and every case is different and must be judged on its own merits.

Legal Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed as legal advice and does not form the basis for an attorney/client relationship.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
This web site is not intended to be advertising, and Schlichter Bogard & Denton LLP does not desire to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this web site in a jurisdiction where this web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that jurisdiction. Materials on this web site may only be reproduced in their entirety (without modification) for the individual reader's personal and/or educational use and must include this notice.

We will not disclose, sell, or rent any of your identifiable personal information to any third party, unless approved by you, or required by law.