Call Us: 1.800.873.5297


Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit Update: Settlement Reached in New Jersey State Court Case Against C.R. Bard

Bloomberg News reports that C.R. Bard has agreed to settle a case set for trial this month in the New Jersey state court consolidation. The case involving Melanie Virgil was set to begin on September 23, 2013 in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Ms. Virgil is a junior high music teacher from Colorado who alleges that her transvaginal mesh device has caused her significant pain and injury, while forcing her to undergo three revision surgeries (Virgil v. C.R. Bard Inc., Case No. ATL-L6917-10). C.R. Bard has agreed to pay an undisclosed amount and the terms of the settlement have not been disclosed.

This is the second case against C.R. Bard that has settled after the first federal transvaginal mesh trial took place in July, where a West Virginia jury entered a trial verdict in favor of plaintiff Donna Cisson (Cisson v. C.R. Bard Inc., Case No. 2:11-cv-00195) finding that a Bard Avaulta Plus device degraded her body, causing her pain and other physical ailments and requiring her to undergo several revision surgeries. The settlement of Ms. Wanda Queen came afterward, which was the first reported settlement of an undisclosed amount in the pending federal Multidistrict Litigation. A C.R. Bard spokesperson confirmed at that time that the settlement in this individual case was not part of a larger resolution of thousands of other C.R. Bard cases pending.

C.R. Bard faces thousands of other claims from women alleging that their transvaginal mesh device caused serious injuries. In particular, women across the nation have reported a number of serious complications stemming from these transvaginal mesh devices, such as device erosion, organ perforation, intense pain, inability to have sexual intercourse and infection. Many of these women have been required to undergo multiple revision surgeries. Federal cases are consolidated in a Multidistrict Litigation against C.R. Bard, In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation (MDL 2187) that is pending in the Southern District of West Virginia, as well as several state court consolidations – including New Jersey.

If you or a loved one have experienced serious injuries as a result of a transvaginal mesh device, please contact one of our experienced attorneys at Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, LLP toll-free at 1-800-873-5297. We will confidentially evaluate your case for free and without any obligation.


Legal Disclaimer: The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements. The cases discussed do not predict outcomes in future cases. Past results afford no guarantee of future results and every case is different and must be judged on its own merits.

000-017   000-080   000-089   000-104   000-105   000-106   070-461   100-101   100-105  , 100-105  , 101   101-400   102-400   1V0-601   1Y0-201   1Z0-051   1Z0-060   1Z0-061   1Z0-144   1z0-434   1Z0-803   1Z0-804   1z0-808   200-101   200-120   200-125  , 200-125  , 200-310   200-355   210-060   210-065   210-260   220-801   220-802   220-901   220-902   2V0-620   2V0-621   2V0-621D   300-070   300-075   300-101   300-115   300-135   3002   300-206   300-208   300-209   300-320   350-001   350-018   350-029   350-030   350-050   350-060   350-080   352-001   400-051   400-101   400-201   500-260   640-692   640-911   640-916   642-732   642-999   700-501   70-177   70-178   70-243   70-246   70-270   70-346   70-347   70-410   70-411   70-412   70-413   70-417   70-461   70-462   70-463   70-480   70-483   70-486   70-487   70-488   70-532   70-533   70-534   70-980   74-678   810-403   9A0-385   9L0-012   9L0-066   ADM-201   AWS-SYSOPS   C_TFIN52_66   c2010-652   c2010-657   CAP   CAS-002   CCA-500   CISM   CISSP   CRISC   EX200   EX300   HP0-S42   ICBB   ICGB   ITILFND   JK0-022   JN0-102   JN0-360   LX0-103   LX0-104   M70-101   MB2-704   MB2-707   MB5-705   MB6-703   N10-006   NS0-157   NSE4   OG0-091   OG0-093   PEGACPBA71V1   PMP   PR000041   SSCP   SY0-401   VCP550  

Legal Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed as legal advice and does not form the basis for an attorney/client relationship.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
This web site is not intended to be advertising, and Schlichter Bogard & Denton LLP does not desire to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this web site in a jurisdiction where this web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that jurisdiction. Materials on this web site may only be reproduced in their entirety (without modification) for the individual reader's personal and/or educational use and must include this notice.

We will not disclose, sell, or rent any of your identifiable personal information to any third party, unless approved by you, or required by law.