Call Us: 1.800.873.5297

By

TVM Update: $5.7 Million Jury Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson in California Transvaginal Mesh Case

According to Reuters, yet another jury has returned a multi-million dollar award against Johnson & Johnson in a vaginal mesh lawsuit. In the latest of a series of trials, a California state jury sitting in Kern County awarded a $5.7 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiary Ethicon for complications with Ethicon’s Gynecare TVT […]

By

Transvaginal Mesh (TVM) Lawsuit Update: 3.25 Million Jury Verdict Against Ethicon

Yahoo! News reports that a federal jury in West Virginia has awarded a woman with $3.27 Million in damages for injuries due to Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon transvaginal mesh product. The plaintiff, Jo Huskey, was implanted with a Gynecare TVT Obturator transvaginal mesh device in 2011 to treat stress urinary continence (SUI) and experienced problems […]

By

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit Update: 200 Additional C.R. Bard Avaulta Cases will be Selected for Trial

The litigation involving C.R. Bard’s Avaulta transvaginal mesh continues to move forward. The Honorable Judge Joseph Goodwin, who presides over the C.R. Bard Multidistrict Litigation (MDL 2187) pending in the Southern District of West Virginia, has issued an order requiring that 200 additional cases be selected for trial. In particular, he is requiring attorneys from […]

By

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit Update: Over 31,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits On File in Federal Court

As of now, over 31,000 transvaginal mesh lawsuits are currently pending in federal courts – and the number of cases continues to grow. According to the most recent report released by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), there are six multidistrict litigations involving different transvaginal mesh device manufacturers where approximately 31,170 lawsuits are pending. Since August, […]

By

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit Status Update: Settlement Reached in Second Federal Trial Scheduled to Begin Against C.R. Bard

Bloomberg News reports that the second federal trial in the Multidistrict Litigation against C.R. Bard, In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation (MDL 2187), was scheduled to begin in West Virginia this week involving Ms. Wanda Queen from North Carolina who alleges that her transvaginal mesh device has caused her significant […]

By

Transvaginal Mesh Device Lawsuit Update: Nearly 23,000 Lawsuits Pending in Federal Court

The first federal transvaginal mesh (TVM) trial resumed on July 29, 2013 for the Multidistrict Litigation (MDL ) in the Southern District of West Virginia before The Honorable Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. This first bellwether trial involves plaintiff Donna Cisson, who claims that a Bard Avaulta Plus device degraded her body, causing her pain and […]

000-017   000-080   000-089   000-104   000-105   000-106   070-461   100-101   100-105  , 100-105  , 101   101-400   102-400   1V0-601   1Y0-201   1Z0-051   1Z0-060   1Z0-061   1Z0-144   1z0-434   1Z0-803   1Z0-804   1z0-808   200-101   200-120   200-125  , 200-125  , 200-310   200-355   210-060   210-065   210-260   220-801   220-802   220-901   220-902   2V0-620   2V0-621   2V0-621D   300-070   300-075   300-101   300-115   300-135   3002   300-206   300-208   300-209   300-320   350-001   350-018   350-029   350-030   350-050   350-060   350-080   352-001   400-051   400-101   400-201   500-260   640-692   640-911   640-916   642-732   642-999   700-501   70-177   70-178   70-243   70-246   70-270   70-346   70-347   70-410   70-411   70-412   70-413   70-417   70-461   70-462   70-463   70-480   70-483   70-486   70-487   70-488   70-532   70-533   70-534   70-980   74-678   810-403   9A0-385   9L0-012   9L0-066   ADM-201   AWS-SYSOPS   C_TFIN52_66   c2010-652   c2010-657   CAP   CAS-002   CCA-500   CISM   CISSP   CRISC   EX200   EX300   HP0-S42   ICBB   ICGB   ITILFND   JK0-022   JN0-102   JN0-360   LX0-103   LX0-104   M70-101   MB2-704   MB2-707   MB5-705   MB6-703   N10-006   NS0-157   NSE4   OG0-091   OG0-093   PEGACPBA71V1   PMP   PR000041   SSCP   SY0-401   VCP550  

Legal Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed as legal advice and does not form the basis for an attorney/client relationship.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
This web site is not intended to be advertising, and Schlichter Bogard & Denton LLP does not desire to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this web site in a jurisdiction where this web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that jurisdiction. Materials on this web site may only be reproduced in their entirety (without modification) for the individual reader's personal and/or educational use and must include this notice.

We will not disclose, sell, or rent any of your identifiable personal information to any third party, unless approved by you, or required by law.