Previous Posts
- This blog has moved
- Avandia Given Positive Reviews Due to $$$$$?
- The FDA and Drug Approval
- J&J Planned Profit from Risky, Unapproved Uses of ...
- What Are the Different Classes of Drug Recalls?
- What Is the Difference Between Class Action and Mu...
- First Lawsuit for Avandia Filed In Santa Clara Cou...
- Our Involvement in the Yaz®/Yasmin® Litigation
- What Is An FDA Black Box Warning?
- What Is a Drug Recall?
Archives
- April 2008
- May 2008
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
Click Here to View
Our Other Site
Thursday, August 6, 2009
New Organ Transplant Process Almost Eliminates Chances of Rejecting the Organ
Surgeons in two Washington, D.C. area hospitals have performed seven kidney transplants involving 14 donors and recipients that did not have matching antibodies, using a process that almost completely eliminates the chances of a recipient’s immune system rejecting the organ. The process, plasmapheresis, is the use of a machine to remove antibodies from a person’s blood that can cause an organ rejection.
Doctors predict that through the use of this process, racial and ethnic groups that are typically underserved in organ donation will have a better chance of receiving an organ. For example, there are currently 80,000 people on the kidney transplant waiting list in the United States. Of those, 36% are African-American, but only 15% of living donor kidneys go to African-Americans. Doctors say that the discrepancy is caused by the lack of suitable matching organs. As a rule, people are more genetically similar and therefore better organ transplant match-ups, if they are from the same racial or ethnic group.
Although minorities donate organs at rate proportionate to other ethnic groups, they also have greater needs for transplants because of diseases that are more prevalent in particular ethnic or racial groups. For example, African-Americans, Asian and Pacific Islanders, and Latinos are three times more likely than Caucasians to have kidney disease, the Health Department says. Through the use of plasmapheresis, doctors hope that the chances of a racial minority receiving a life-saving organ will increase.
For more information, see the CNN article at:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/08/05/kidney.transplant.plasmapheresis/index.html?eref=rss_health
Doctors predict that through the use of this process, racial and ethnic groups that are typically underserved in organ donation will have a better chance of receiving an organ. For example, there are currently 80,000 people on the kidney transplant waiting list in the United States. Of those, 36% are African-American, but only 15% of living donor kidneys go to African-Americans. Doctors say that the discrepancy is caused by the lack of suitable matching organs. As a rule, people are more genetically similar and therefore better organ transplant match-ups, if they are from the same racial or ethnic group.
Although minorities donate organs at rate proportionate to other ethnic groups, they also have greater needs for transplants because of diseases that are more prevalent in particular ethnic or racial groups. For example, African-Americans, Asian and Pacific Islanders, and Latinos are three times more likely than Caucasians to have kidney disease, the Health Department says. Through the use of plasmapheresis, doctors hope that the chances of a racial minority receiving a life-saving organ will increase.
For more information, see the CNN article at:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/08/05/kidney.transplant.plasmapheresis/index.html?eref=rss_health
Labels: African-American, anitbodies, kidney, organ donation, organ transplant, rejection
posted by
Colleen
at
12:25 PM
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
EEOC Files Lawsuit Against St. Louis Construction Company
A lawsuit has just been filed against A&A Contracting, a St. Louis based construction company, for firing a worker with a history of health problems. The lawsuit, filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), alleges that the company fired Rickie Wells because he had a history of liver and kidney problems as well as being diagnosed with cancer. At the time that Mr. Wells was terminated, he was in good health and was cleared to work by his doctor.
The EEOC says A&A Contracting became aware of Wells' health history when he applied for the company's health insurance coverage. Federal law bars discrimination against employees and applicants who are disabled or have a record of disability. The lawsuit seeks back pay for Wells and damages.
For more information, see the article from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch at:
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/D648607E64C713EF862575ED003E5D6A?OpenDocument
The EEOC says A&A Contracting became aware of Wells' health history when he applied for the company's health insurance coverage. Federal law bars discrimination against employees and applicants who are disabled or have a record of disability. The lawsuit seeks back pay for Wells and damages.
For more information, see the article from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch at:
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/D648607E64C713EF862575ED003E5D6A?OpenDocument
Labels: AA Contracting, cancer, EEOC, kidney, St. louis
posted by
Colleen
at
7:12 AM