Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Should Hospitals Have to Offer Long Term Care to Indigent Non-documented Immigrants?
Should Hospitals Have to Offer Long Term Care to Indigent Non-documented Immigrants
In a benchmark case dealing with the obligations of hospitals toward uninsured illegal immigrants, a
Luis Jimenez, now 37, immigrated to the
In July 2003,
Montejo Gaspar, Jimenez’s cousin and legal guardian has sued the hospital for repatriating Jimenez. Lawsuit seeks nearly $1 million to cover the estimated lifetime costs of his care in
The underlying question was what should a hospital do with a patient who requires long-term care, is unable to pay and doesn’t qualify for federal or state aid because of his immigration status. This appears to be the first time a lawsuit has been filed in such a case.
Just before jury deliberations, Senior Judge James Midelis told jurors that the only decision to be made was whether the hospital’s action were “unreasonable and unwarranted” under the circumstances. It has already been determined that Jimenez was “unlawfully detained and deprived of liberty” by the hospital and that the hospital had acted against the will of his legal guardian.
The all- White jury declined to comment on their verdict that the hospital did not act unreasonably in repatriating Jimenez to
Labels: Florida, Guatemala, health care reform, illegal immigrants, Luis Jimenez, Martin Memorial Medical
posted by
Jessica
at
7:19 AM
Monday, June 29, 2009
Accutane Pulled Off the Market after Jury Verdict
About 13 million people have used Accutane since it went on the market in 1982. The medication was Roche’s second-biggest selling drug before the patent expired in 2002 and rivals started selling generic versions. Roche’s prescription market share of the drug is now below 5 percent, the company said.
The company faces as many as 5,000 personal injury claims over Accutane, said Michael Hook, a Pensacola, Florida based attorney, who won a $10.5 million verdict against the drug maker over the medicine in April 2008. “We’ve been winning the cases with the drug still on the market, but this move certainly isn’t going to hurt us going forward”, Hook said in an interview today.
Use of Accutane has been linked to birth defects and depression. Users allege that the drug maker failed to properly warn that the medicine could cause inflammatory bowel disease.
For more information see: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20670001&sid=aRyzfbTsj3h8
Labels: acne, cancer drug, FDA, Florida, personal injury
posted by
Chavon Williams
at
11:07 AM
