Call Us: 1.800.873.5297

By

DePuy ASR™ MDL Lawsuit Update: Settlement Reached in the DePuy ASR™ Hip Implant Multidistrict Litigation (MDL 2197)

According to court documents filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in the Multidistrict Litigation In re: DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., ASR™ Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL 2197 (Case No. 10-md-2197), the settlement agreement has now been released. The settlement agreement outlines that there will be a base payment of $250,000 for each plaintiff involved in the federal multidistrict litigation (MDL 2197) who has underwent revision surgery to remove the ASR™ hip implant by or before August 31, 2013. Additional monies could be offered for persons who underwent bilateral revision or re-revision surgeries. However, there are additional factors that must be taken into consideration for each particular case and would potentially reduce the amount of the plaintiff’s base payment of $250,000, including but not limited to the following factors: body weight, length of time that the device was implanted, smoking history, and age.

The deadline for plaintiffs to register to participate in the settlement is January 6, 2014 and all necessary enrollment documents must be submitted by April 1, 2014. The settlement agreement outlines that the manufacturers have the right to walk away from the settlement if more than 6% of those eligible to enter into the settlement do not enroll by the deadline. If there is sufficient participation in the settlement, then it will proceed with payments made under the settlement agreement in the summer of 2014.

Kristine Kraft, partner at Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, LLP representing victims of dangerous pharmaceutical medications and unsafe medical devices, stresses that it is very important for victims implanted with DePuy ASR™ devices to consult with an attorney. Kraft stated, “Any person implanted with DePuy ASR™ devices should speak to an attorney for careful consideration of their claim pertaining to the settlement in order to protect their rights, especially in a mass settlement such as this.”

Since the withdrawal of the DePuy ASR™ (Articular Surface Replacement) hip device from the market in August 2010, thousands of lawsuits have been filed against Johnson & Johnson in the federal Multidistrict Litigation pending in the Northern District of Ohio (MDL 2197) alleging injuries to persons who had the defective DePuy ASR™ hip products implanted during hip replacement surgeries. According to the most recent report from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, there are over 8,500 cases pending in the DePuy ASR™ Multidistrict Litigation (MDL 2197).

According to a recent report by The New York Times, 93,000 patients have had a DePuy ASR™ hip device implanted. More importantly, Johnson & Johnson knew – even as far back as 2008 – that nearly 40 percent of patients with a DePuy ASR™ hip would experience total failure within five years. In a separate article published in January, The New York Times reports that the FDA has now issued new guidelines for the approval of metal-on-metal (“MoM”) implants, which include a provision that any MoM implant must first undergo rigorous, comprehensive clinical testing prior to being introduced to the market.

If you or a loved one has experienced complications with a DePuy ASR™ hip device, please contact the experienced attorneys attorneys at Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, LLP toll-free at 1-800-873-5297 for your confidential and free consultation.

 

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements. The cases discussed do not predict outcomes in future cases. Past results afford no guarantee of future results and every case is different and must be judged on its own merits.

000-017   000-080   000-089   000-104   000-105   000-106   070-461   100-101   100-105  , 100-105  , 101   101-400   102-400   1V0-601   1Y0-201   1Z0-051   1Z0-060   1Z0-061   1Z0-144   1z0-434   1Z0-803   1Z0-804   1z0-808   200-101   200-120   200-125  , 200-125  , 200-310   200-355   210-060   210-065   210-260   220-801   220-802   220-901   220-902   2V0-620   2V0-621   2V0-621D   300-070   300-075   300-101   300-115   300-135   3002   300-206   300-208   300-209   300-320   350-001   350-018   350-029   350-030   350-050   350-060   350-080   352-001   400-051   400-101   400-201   500-260   640-692   640-911   640-916   642-732   642-999   700-501   70-177   70-178   70-243   70-246   70-270   70-346   70-347   70-410   70-411   70-412   70-413   70-417   70-461   70-462   70-463   70-480   70-483   70-486   70-487   70-488   70-532   70-533   70-534   70-980   74-678   810-403   9A0-385   9L0-012   9L0-066   ADM-201   AWS-SYSOPS   C_TFIN52_66   c2010-652   c2010-657   CAP   CAS-002   CCA-500   CISM   CISSP   CRISC   EX200   EX300   HP0-S42   ICBB   ICGB   ITILFND   JK0-022   JN0-102   JN0-360   LX0-103   LX0-104   M70-101   MB2-704   MB2-707   MB5-705   MB6-703   N10-006   NS0-157   NSE4   OG0-091   OG0-093   PEGACPBA71V1   PMP   PR000041   SSCP   SY0-401   VCP550  

Legal Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed as legal advice and does not form the basis for an attorney/client relationship.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
This web site is not intended to be advertising, and Schlichter Bogard & Denton LLP does not desire to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this web site in a jurisdiction where this web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that jurisdiction. Materials on this web site may only be reproduced in their entirety (without modification) for the individual reader's personal and/or educational use and must include this notice.

We will not disclose, sell, or rent any of your identifiable personal information to any third party, unless approved by you, or required by law.