Call Us: 1.800.873.5297


Avandia’s Safety Still in Question? Not According to Glaxo

It seems like the general public is the only group that fully understands the dangers the Type 2 diabetes drug, Avandia, presents to those taking it. For years now, we have been reading about the significant increase in cardiac events in diabetics taking the drug versus those taking a placebo or no drug at all. Why is this drug still on the market? Why are doctors still prescribing Avandia? Is the FDA really protecting consumers or protecting the drug companies’ wallets?

The safety of Avandia (generic rosiglitazone) has been in question since 1999 when Dr. John Buse of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, a diabetes expert, performed a study in which he concluded that Avandia users experienced a “more than fourfold rise in cholesterol compared with those taking a placebo. Because elevated cholesterol levels are a risk factor for heart disease…Avandia could cause adverse cardiac outcomes.” When the maker of Avandia, GlaxoSmithKline, received a copy of this report, reps called Dr. Buse’s boss, accused him of lying and stated he needed to be “muzzled.” GSK then threatened to sue for $4 billion, which was the loss of the company’s valuation. After receiving Dr. Buse’s compelling evidence that Avandia did, indeed, increase cardiac events in users of the drug, GSK continued marketing the drug and even went so far as to find a doctor who reported that the drug actually reduced cardiovascular risk factors in laboratory animals.

By 2004, Avandia was making over $1.5 billion a year for Glaxo in the United States alone. In May of 2006, GSK provided the FDA with research indicating that Avandia use did cause a jump in adverse cardiac events, but the FDA did not release this information to the public. Why? Dr. Janet Woodcock, head of the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, “didn’t necessarily agree with some of the methodology used.”

Three years later, in May of 2007, Cleveland Clinic cardiologist, Dr. Steven Nissan analyzed 42 Avandia trials and submitted a report to the New England Journal of Medicine that there was a 43% higher rate of cardiac events among Avandia patients compared with those taking other drugs or placebos. It is now August 2010, and Avandia is still on the market and still being prescribed to millions of people who may not know how dangerous this drug is. GSK continues to insist its diabetes drug is safe and effective, and in July 2010, the FDA advisory group voted to not pull Avandia off the market, citing lack of strong evidence that it should be taken off the market.

Statistics regarding Avandia and cardiac events and death are not exact for several reasons, but Dr. David Graham, the lead author of the study that prompted the FDA to hold the hearing regarding the safety of the drug, asserts that 100,000 heart attacks, strokes, cases of heart failure, and deaths have occurred due to Avandia since it came on the market in 1999. How many more people have to suffer before the FDA recalls this drug?

If you or a loved one has taken Avandia and suffered any adverse side effect, please contact the experienced pharmaceutical liability attorneys at Schlichter, Bogard & Denton. We are currently taking Avandia cases and would like to help you if you have been harmed by this very dangerous drug.

000-017   000-080   000-089   000-104   000-105   000-106   070-461   100-101   100-105  , 100-105  , 101   101-400   102-400   1V0-601   1Y0-201   1Z0-051   1Z0-060   1Z0-061   1Z0-144   1z0-434   1Z0-803   1Z0-804   1z0-808   200-101   200-120   200-125  , 200-125  , 200-310   200-355   210-060   210-065   210-260   220-801   220-802   220-901   220-902   2V0-620   2V0-621   2V0-621D   300-070   300-075   300-101   300-115   300-135   3002   300-206   300-208   300-209   300-320   350-001   350-018   350-029   350-030   350-050   350-060   350-080   352-001   400-051   400-101   400-201   500-260   640-692   640-911   640-916   642-732   642-999   700-501   70-177   70-178   70-243   70-246   70-270   70-346   70-347   70-410   70-411   70-412   70-413   70-417   70-461   70-462   70-463   70-480   70-483   70-486   70-487   70-488   70-532   70-533   70-534   70-980   74-678   810-403   9A0-385   9L0-012   9L0-066   ADM-201   AWS-SYSOPS   C_TFIN52_66   c2010-652   c2010-657   CAP   CAS-002   CCA-500   CISM   CISSP   CRISC   EX200   EX300   HP0-S42   ICBB   ICGB   ITILFND   JK0-022   JN0-102   JN0-360   LX0-103   LX0-104   M70-101   MB2-704   MB2-707   MB5-705   MB6-703   N10-006   NS0-157   NSE4   OG0-091   OG0-093   PEGACPBA71V1   PMP   PR000041   SSCP   SY0-401   VCP550  

Legal Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed as legal advice and does not form the basis for an attorney/client relationship.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
This web site is not intended to be advertising, and Schlichter Bogard & Denton LLP does not desire to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this web site in a jurisdiction where this web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that jurisdiction. Materials on this web site may only be reproduced in their entirety (without modification) for the individual reader's personal and/or educational use and must include this notice.

We will not disclose, sell, or rent any of your identifiable personal information to any third party, unless approved by you, or required by law.